- How clear is the thesis? How debatable is it? Does it make a positive claim?
- Does the thesis accurately preview the paper? Are any parts of the paper not a clear fit with the thesis?
- Can you follow the argument clearly from start to finish? Does the paper's organization help you understand the necessary background information? Does the paper build up the argument and evidence persuasively?
- Does everything in the draft lead to or follow from one central thesis? If not, which ideas appear to be out of place?
Are the claims backed up with evidence? Is the evidence appropriate? Is it sufficient? Does any evidence need further explanation or context? - If there's an image, does the text explain it? Does it help you understand the argument or illustrate an important point?
- What's the absolute awesomest thing about this paper? What do you think could use the most improvement?
The Pickier Stuff
- Does the writer provide necessary background information about the source, including author and/or title for sources?
- Throughout the essay, when referring to sources, does the writer supply necessary documentation?
Are there clear transitions or connectives that connect the writer’s own ideas to those of sources? - Are there transitions between paragraphs? How smooth are they?
Is the organizational plan or form appropriate for this kind of paper? If not, can you suggest another format?
Does the writer open the paper in a way that catches the reader’s attention? - Does the conclusion amply restate the main idea? Does it offer new insights? Are the new insights too much for a conclusion?
- Do the sentences flow? Is there a variety of lengths of sentences?
- Is the word choice effective? Are the same words used to begin and end sentences? Are there positive or negative words or phrases that will make an impression on the reader?
Finally...
- What 2 things most need improving about the paper?
- What did you like most about the paper?
No comments:
Post a Comment